Journal article
Symptom networks of therapy-seeking individuals with comorbid psychosis and PTSD
- Abstract:
-
Background
Post-traumatic sequelae are theorized to contribute to and maintain psychotic symptoms. The relative contribution of core posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and those of complex PTSD are understudied. Network analysis was used to examine interactions between psychosis, core PTSD, and complex post-traumatic symptoms. Based on previous evidence, it was predicted that trauma-related beliefs would have the greatest predictability. It was also hypothesized that the association between voices and trauma-related beliefs would be greater than the association between voices and re-experiencing.Methods
Baseline data from the Study of Trauma and Recovery (STAR), a randomized controlled therapy trial of people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder who experience distressing delusions and/or hallucinations and comorbid PTSD (N = 305). A network was estimated using a Bayesian Gaussian graphical model, comprised of psychosis symptoms (delusions and voices), posttraumatic stress symptoms (re-experiencing, avoidance, and sense of threat), complex posttraumatic stress symptoms (affective dysregulation, negative self-concept, disturbed relationships), and trauma-related beliefs (negative cognitions about the self and world, self-blame). A direct acyclic graph was plotted to estimate the potential directionality of associations between symptoms.Results
The hypotheses were not supported. All symptoms had similar predictability scores. There was no evidence for conditionally dependent relations between re-experiencing and voices nor between trauma-related beliefs and voices. However, self-blame was associated with delusions, and affective dysregulation was found to predict voices.Conclusions
Affective dysregulation and self-blame may maintain voices and delusions, respectively. Heterogeneity in trauma-related psychosis could explain inconsistent findings; future research should identify symptom presentation subgroups to improve network reliability.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/s0033291726104978
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Psychological Medicine More from this journal
- Volume:
- 56
- Pages:
- e239-e239
- Article number:
- e239
- Publication date:
- 2026-07-28
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-8978
- ISSN:
-
0033-2917
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2448383
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2448383
- Source identifiers:
-
W7171539523
- Deposit date:
-
2026-08-06
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record