Journal article icon

Journal article

A preliminary modeling investigation into the safe correction zone for high tibial osteotomy

Abstract:

Background

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) re-aligns the weight-bearing axis (WBA) of the lower limb. The surgery reduces medial load (reducing pain and slowing progression of cartilage damage) while avoiding overloading the lateral compartment. The optimal correction has not been established. This study investigated how different WBA re-alignments affected load distribution in the knee, to consider the optimal post-surgery re-alignment.

Methods

We collected motion analysis and seven Tesla MRI data from three healthy subjects, and combined this data to create sets of subject-specific finite element models (total = 45 models). Each set of models simulated a range of potential post-HTO knee re-alignments. We shifted the WBA from its native alignment to between 40% and 80% medial–lateral tibial width (corresponding to 2.8°–3.1° varus and 8.5°–9.3° valgus), in three percent increments. We then compared stress/pressure distributions in the models.

Results

Correcting the WBA to 50% tibial width (0° varus–valgus) approximately halved medial compartment stresses, with minimal changes to lateral stress levels, but provided little margin for error in undercorrection. Correcting the WBA to a more commonly-used 62%–65% tibial width (3.4°–4.6° valgus) further reduced medial stresses but introduced the danger of damaging lateral compartment tissues. To balance optimal loading environment with that of the historical risk of under-correction, we propose a new target: WBA correction to 55% tibial width (1.7°–1.9° valgus), which anatomically represented the apex of the lateral tibial spine.

Conclusions

Finite element models can successfully simulate a variety of HTO re-alignments. Correcting the WBA to 55% tibial width (1.7°–1.9° valgus) optimally distributes medial and lateral stresses/pressures.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.knee.2017.12.006

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4616-7482
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
Clinical Neurosciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1673-2148


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Knee More from this journal
Volume:
25
Issue:
2
Pages:
286-295
Publication date:
2018-02-01
Acceptance date:
2017-12-23
DOI:
EISSN:
1873-5800
ISSN:
0968-0160
Pmid:
29395747


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:821820
UUID:
uuid:c23334d1-e14a-4d1e-9ba9-14d10b43143d
Local pid:
pubs:821820
Source identifiers:
821820
Deposit date:
2018-05-18
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP