Journal article
Oiling the machine: overriding mandatory provisions and public policy in the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts
- Abstract:
-
Art. 11 of the Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts, adopted by the Council of the Hague Conference in March 2015 contains provisions governing the relationship between the system of law1 chosen by the parties under Art. 2(1) (the “chosen law”) and the laws and policies of other systems. It provides as follows:
1. These Principles shall not prevent a court from applying overriding mandatory provisions of the law of the forum which apply irrespective of t...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Accepted manuscript, pdf, 469.9KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/ulr/unx024
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Uniform Law Review Journal website
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 402-421
- Publication date:
- 2017-06-23
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-04-27
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2050-9065
- ISSN:
-
1124-3694
- Source identifiers:
-
692096
Item Description
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:692096
- UUID:
-
uuid:c0f217d6-0fe4-468d-bdc8-ecd181402520
- Local pid:
- pubs:692096
- Deposit date:
- 2017-05-02
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Dickinson, A
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
-
© The Author (2017). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of UNIDROIT.
All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Oxford University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unx024
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record