Journal article
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents and adults: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- Abstract:
-
Introduction
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a major public health issue. Pharmacological treatments play an important role in the multimodal treatment of ADHD. Currently, there is a lack of up-to-date and comprehensive evidence on how available ADHD drugs compare and rank in terms of efficacy and tolerability, in children or adolescents as well as in adults. We will conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA), integrating direct and indirect comparisons from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), to rank pharmacological treatments for ADHD according to their efficacy and tolerability profiles.
Methods and analysis
We will search a broad range of electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science, with no date or language restrictions. We will also search for unpublished studies using international clinical trial registries and contacting relevant drug companies. We will identify and include available parallel-group, cross-over and cluster randomised trials that compare methylphenidate, dexmethylphenidate, amphetamine derivatives, lisdexamfetamine, atomoxetine, clonidine, guanfacine, bupropion, or modafinil (as oral therapy) either with each other or to placebo, in children, adolescents or adults with ADHD. Primary outcomes will be efficacy (indicated by reduction in severity of ADHD core symptoms measured on a standardised scale) and tolerability (the proportion of patients who left a study early due to side effects). Secondary outcomes will be global functioning, acceptability (proportion of patients who left the study early by any cause), and changes in blood pressure and body weight. NMA will be conducted in STATA within a frequentist framework. The quality of RCTs will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the quality of the evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 963.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013967
Authors
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- BMJ Open More from this journal
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- e013967
- Publication date:
- 2017-01-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-11-16
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
2044-6055
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:670902
- UUID:
-
uuid:bfd4d88e-4b4b-47f4-af2f-a2c4552c6992
- Local pid:
-
pubs:670902
- Source identifiers:
-
670902
- Deposit date:
-
2017-01-20
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Cipriani et al
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
-
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record