Book section
Detecting and correcting conservativity principle violations in ontology−to−ontology mappings
- Abstract:
-
In order to enable interoperability between ontology-based systems, ontology matching techniques have been proposed. However, when the generated mappings suffer from logical flaws, their usefulness may be diminished. In this paper we present an approximate method to detect and correct violations to the so-called conservativity principle where novel subsumption entailments between named concepts in one of the input ontologies are considered as unwanted. We show that this is indeed the case in our application domain based on the EU Optique project. Additionally, our extensive evaluation conducted with both the Optique use case and the data sets from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) suggests that our method is both useful and feasible in practice.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 311.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1007/978-3-319-11915-1_1
- Publisher:
- Springer International Publishing
- Host title:
- The Semantic Web – ISWC 2014
- Volume:
- 8797
- Pages:
- 1-16
- Publication date:
- 2014-01-01
- Edition:
- Accepted Manuscript
- DOI:
- ISBN:
- 9783319119144
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- UUID:
-
uuid:be801169-c1bc-49d5-981d-8f4deae1eb25
- Local pid:
-
ora:9386
- Deposit date:
-
2014-11-25
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Springer International Publishing Switzerland
- Copyright date:
- 2014
- Notes:
- Copyright 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland. The final publication is available at http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-11915-1_1
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record