Journal article icon

Journal article

Does general practice deliver safe primary care to people living with HIV? A case-notes review

Abstract:
PhDThe UK National Guidelines on HIV Testing 2008 recommended that adults in areas where more than 2/1000 people were living with HIV be considered for an HIV test at the point of registration with general practice. The RHIVA2 trial of rapid HIV testing in primary care implemented and evaluated this recommendation across 20 general practices in a single UK borough using a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. This trial, and the policy that underpinned it, reflected two more general developments: first, the move towards population screening to detect and treat disease in early and latent stages and second, the emergence of ‘pragmatic’ clinical trials that seek to account for complexity and measure interventions in their context of use. This interdisciplinary case study uses multiple methods and theoretical frames to explore what happened in the RHIVA2 trial at both an empirical and a theoretical level. Sub-studies reveal how the trial was justified, enacted and became meaningful as a policy, as a trial, and as an intervention in the lives of patients. My analyses show that two operating logics informed the justification and enactment of the trial and patterned patient and provider experiences. The first, the logic of normalisation for HIV aims to treat HIV infection as a medical condition ‘like any other’. This logic emphasises general practice as a site of increased value and position in HIV management and as a space where population screening can be undertaken. Second, the logic of the pragmatic trial aims to measure interventions in the ‘real world’ but is revealed to produce unintended effects, raising questions about the claims of such trials to generalisability and reproducibility. This thesis demonstrates how contrasting versions of the research event (‘multiplicity’) can be produced through different modes of inquiry, raising questions about the tension between situated and generalisable findings.National Institute of Health Research Doctoral training programm
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2923-345X
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5294-8707


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
65
Issue:
639
Pages:
e655-e661
Publication date:
2015-09-27
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2407074
Local pid:
pubs:2407074
Source identifiers:
W2354951829
Deposit date:
2026-04-23
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP