Journal article

Human rights shortcomings of the Dayton Peace Agreement

Abstract:: When a peace agreement guarantees the rights of certain groups but not all, limitations to the enjoyment of human rights are inevitable.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Reviewed (other)

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Pilegaard, L., & Dzumhur, J. (2015). Human rights shortcomings of the Dayton Peace Agreement. Forced Migration Review, 50, 32–34.

MLA Style

Pilegaard, L., and J. Dzumhur. “Human Rights Shortcomings of the Dayton Peace Agreement.” Forced Migration Review, no. 50, Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford, 2015, pp. 32–34.

Chicago Style

Pilegaard, L, and J Dzumhur. 2015. “Human Rights Shortcomings of the Dayton Peace Agreement.” Forced Migration Review, no. 50: 32–34.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: Human rights shortcomings - English.pdf

(Preview, pdf, 326.1KB, Terms of use)

Publication website:: http://www.fmreview.org/dayton20/pilegaard-dzumhur

Authors

+ Pilegaard, L More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Dzumhur, J More by this author

Role:: Author

Publisher:: Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford
Journal:: Forced Migration Review More from this journal
Issue:: 50
Pages:: 32-34
Publication date:: 2015-09-01
ISSN:: 1460-9819

Keywords:: Herzegovina

Bosnia

Dayton Peace Agreement

FMR
Subjects:: Forced Migration
UUID:: uuid:bd42d1a3-1d40-4d3c-a374-e64eb01d734e
Deposit date:: 2015-09-22

Terms of use

Copyright date:: 2015

Licence:: CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND)

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP