Journal article
Postoperative outcomes associated with surgical care for women in Africa: an international risk-adjusted analysis of prospective observational cohorts
- Abstract:
-
Background: Improving women's health is a critical component of the sustainable development goals. Although obstetric outcomes in Africa have received significant focus, non-obstetric surgical outcomes for women in Africa remain under-examined.
Methods: We did a secondary analysis of the African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS) and International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), two 7-day prospective observational cohort studies of outcomes after adult inpatient surgery. This sub-study focuses specifically on the analysis of the female, elective, non-obstetric, non-gynaecological surgical data collected during these two large multicentre studies. The African data from both cohorts are compared with international (non-African) outcomes in a risk-adjusted logistic regression analysis using a generalised linear mixed-effects model. The primary outcome was severe postoperative complications including in-hospital mortality in Africa compared with non-African outcomes.
Results: A total of 1698 African participants and 18 449 international participants met the inclusion criteria. The African cohort were younger than the international cohort with a lower preoperative risk profile. Severe complications occurred in 48 (2.9%) of 1671, and 431 (2.3%) of 18 449 patients in the African and international cohorts, respectively, with in-hospital mortality after severe complications of 23/48 (47.9%) in Africa and 78/431 (18.1%) internationally. Women in Africa had an adjusted odds ratio of 2.06 (95% confidence interval, 1.17–3.62; P=0.012) of developing a severe postoperative complication after elective non-obstetric, non-gynaecological surgery, compared with the international cohort.
Conclusions: Women in Africa have double the risk adjusted odds of severe postoperative complications (including in-hospital mortality) after elective non-obstetric, non-gynaecological surgery compared with the international incidence.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 326.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100100
Authors
Contributors
- Role:
- Contributor
- Role:
- Contributor
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- BJA Open More from this journal
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- C
- Article number:
- 100100
- Publication date:
- 2022-10-21
- Acceptance date:
- 2022-09-21
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2772-6096
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1599755
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1599755
- Deposit date:
-
2024-01-17
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Paterson et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2022
- Rights statement:
- © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Journal of Anaesthesia. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record