Journal article icon

Journal article

Weir removal for river restoration; observations on best practice and issues for a lowland UK river

Abstract:
Thousands of small river weirs have been constructed over the last ca. 1000 years or more to provide power for milling and crushing ore, for industrialisation, electricity generation and navigation. Alternative power generation and transportation methods have left many of these structures obsolete and/or derelict. Recently, there has been a drive to create ‘free-flowing’ rivers with fewer or no barriers thereby increasing connectivity and improving ecology. Our first aim was to explore a range of literature and legislation on weir removal in the UK and identify the key benefits and drawbacks in removal that have emerged. We found that ecology was only one of many themes that could be used to justify weir removal or retention. Our second aim was to explore the issues involved with weir removal in a lowland river system in the UK based on the West Sussex Rother where three weirs were being considered for removal. The smothering of ecologically important river gravels by sand trapped behind these weirs and the subsequent release of this sand on removal emerged as a potentially new issue not identified in the literature reviewed. Our third aim was to explore management structures and key stakeholders involved in decision making in the Rother catchment, to establish whether a coordinated approach to delivering weir removal as part of a river management plan could be successfully delivered. We found many official and unofficial organisations have a legal or potentially legitimate interest in the Rother that could produce conflicting evidence for the benefits of weir removal. We conclude that strong leadership and good coordination are required to deliver a successful outcome that requires not only consideration of all the issues involved but which promotes public engagement, and the delivery of an evidence base by monitoring the consequences of any management action.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
SOGE
Sub department:
Environmental Change Institute
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-6252-8546


Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Journal:
Progress in Physical Geography More from this journal
Volume:
50
Issue:
2
Pages:
225-245
Article number:
03091333251407020
Publication date:
2025-12-09
Acceptance date:
2025-11-19
DOI:
EISSN:
1477-0296
ISSN:
0309-1333


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2353325
Local pid:
pubs:2353325
Source identifiers:
3859244
Deposit date:
2026-03-17
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP