Journal article
Don't forget to look down - collaborative approaches to predator conservation
- Abstract:
- Finding effective ways of conserving large carnivores is widely recognised as a priority in conservation. However, there is disagreement about the most effective way to do this, with some favouring top-down “command and control” approaches and others favouring collaboration. Arguments for coercive top-down approaches have been presented elsewhere; here we present arguments for collaboration. In many parts of developed world, flexibility of approach is built into the legislation, so that conservation objectives are balanced with other legitimate goals. In the developing world, limited resources, poverty and weak governance mean that collaborative approaches are likely to play a particularly important part in carnivore conservation. In general, coercive policies may lead to the deterioration of political legitimacy and potentially non-compliance issues such as illegal killing, whereas collaborative approaches may lead to psychological ownership, enhanced trust, learning, and better social outcomes. Sustainable hunting/trapping plays a crucial part in the conservation and management of many large carnivores. There are many different models for how to effectively conserve carnivores across the world, research is now required to reduce uncertainty and examine the effectiveness of these approaches in different contexts.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 217.6KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/brv.12326
Authors
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- Journal:
- Biological Reviews More from this journal
- Volume:
- 92
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 2157–2163
- Publication date:
- 2017-03-24
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-02-10
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-185X
- ISSN:
-
1464-7931
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:679221
- UUID:
-
uuid:bbf55244-57d9-4513-bad2-cf44bc737c23
- Local pid:
-
pubs:679221
- Source identifiers:
-
679221
- Deposit date:
-
2017-02-10
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2017 Cambridge Philosophical Society. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Wiley at: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12326
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record