Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK

Mourby, M; Mackey, E; Elliot, M; Gowans, H; Wallace, S; Bell, J; Smith, H; Aidinlis, S; Kaye, J

Journal article

Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK

Abstract:: There has naturally been a good deal of discussion of the forthcoming General Data Protection Regulation. One issue of interest to all data controllers, and of particular concern for researchers, is whether the GDPR expands the scope of personal data through the introduction of the term ‘pseudonymisation’ in Article 4(5). If all data which have been ‘pseudonymised’ in the conventional sense of the word (e.g. key-coded) are to be treated as personal data, this would have serious implications for research. Administrative data research, which is carried out on data routinely collected and held by public authorities, would be particularly affected as the sharing of de-identified data could constitute the unconsented disclosure of identifiable information. Instead, however, we argue that the definition of pseudonymisation in Article 4(5) GDPR will not expand the category of personal data, and that there is no intention that it should do so. The definition of pseudonymisation under the GDPR is not intended to determine whether data are personal data; indeed it is clear that all data falling within this definition are personal data. Rather, it is Recital 26 and its requirement of a ‘means reasonably likely to be used’ which remains the relevant test as to whether data are personal. This leaves open the possibility that data which have been ‘pseudonymised’ in the conventional sense of key-coding can still be rendered anonymous. There may also be circumstances in which data which have undergone pseudonymisation within one organisation could be anonymous for a third party. We explain how, with reference to the data environment factors as set out in the UK Anonymisation Network's Anonymisation Decision-Making Framework.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law and Security Review, 34(2), 222–233.

MLA Style

Mourby, M., et al. “Are ‘Pseudonymised’ Data Always Personal Data? Implications of the GDPR for Administrative Data Research in the UK.” Computer Law and Security Review, vol. 34, no. 2, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 222–33.

Chicago Style

Mourby, M, E Mackey, M Elliot, H Gowans, S Wallace, J Bell, H Smith, S Aidinlis, and J Kaye. 2018. “Are ‘Pseudonymised’ Data Always Personal Data? Implications of the GDPR for Administrative Data Research in the UK.” Computer Law and Security Review 34 (2): 222–33.
Share
Print