Religion and war: a synthesis

Journal article

This chapter draws on the papers in this volume to help develop a global comparative perspective on religion and war. It proceeds by establishing two forms of religiosity: immanentism, versions of which may be found in every society; and transcendentalism, which captures what is distinctive about salvific, expansionary religions such as Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism. This chapter does not suggest that either immanentism or transcendentalism enhance the likelihood of collective violence in themselves. It does, however, argue that these types of religiosity are distinctive in how they drive war, allow enemies to be identified, and rationalize or legitimize collective violence. Some of the paths by which societies may become more bellicose (prone to war) or martial (heavily shaped by a military ethos) are sketched out and certain elective affinities between imperial expansion and transcendentalist systems are proposed. The place of Confucianism in this interpretative schema is discussed towards the end. Many scales of comparison are considered throughout, especially whether the categories of ‘transcendentalism’, ‘monotheism’ or ‘Christianity’’/Islam’ afford the most comparative insight in understanding patterns of violence.

Authors: Strathern, AL

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Taylor and Francis
• Journal: History and Anthropology
• Volume: 34
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 145-174
• Publication date: 2022-10-20
• Acceptance date: 2022-03-28
• DOI: 10.1080/02757206.2022.2060212
• EISSN: 1477-2612
• ISSN: 0275-7206
• Language: English
• Keywords: FFR