Journal article
Still against design: a response to Steven Calabresi, Sanford Levinson, and Vernon Smith
- Abstract:
- Our argument in Against Design may seem new, challenging, or even bizarre. One commenter, Levinson, questions whether we really mean what we say: “I presume that the authors cannot really be arguing that all design is impossible.”1 Given our admittedly unorthodox and perhaps radical challenge to common notions of design, we appreciate the thoughtful attention to our views given by our commenters Vernon Smith, Sanford Levinson and Steven G. Calabresi. Even when disagreeing with us, they have responded to Against Design with open minds.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
- Publisher:
- Arizona State University
- Journal:
- Arizona State Law Journal More from this journal
- Publication date:
- 2016-04-08
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-04-05
- ISSN:
-
0164-4297
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:614582
- UUID:
-
uuid:b8dab5e8-28ee-4e21-a068-5456ab0b8599
- Local pid:
-
pubs:614582
- Source identifiers:
-
614582
- Deposit date:
-
2016-04-08
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Devins et al
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- Author(s) retain copyright; published by Arizona State University under license. This is the publisher's version of the article. The final version is available online from Arizona State University at: [http://arizonastatelawjournal.org/still-against-design-a-response-to-steven-calabresi-sandford-levinson-and-vernon-smith/].
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record