Journal article
Improving Collaborative Engagement in Health State Valuation: A Scoping Review of Current Practices and Emerging Recommendations
- Abstract:
- Background and Objective Collaborative engagement with individuals invested in or affected by health research, beyond researchers themselves, is advantageous and encouraged by major funding bodies. However, the degree of collaborative engagement in health state valuation is unclear. A scoping review was conducted to (i) identify recommendations on best practice in collaborative engagement in health economics and related literature; (ii) identify examples of collaborative engagement in valuation studies; and (iii) map (ii) onto (i) to identify current practice and future recommendations. Methods Eight databases were searched in March-May 2024, with grey literature searches in August-September 2024. For objective (i), reports or manuscripts in health economics or patient-reported outcome measure development/evaluation of any date providing recommendations for collaborative engagement were included. For objective (ii), articles published since 2019 featuring health state valuation and collaborative engagement were included. Best practice recommendations were extracted and thematically synthesised. Examples of collaborative engagement were extracted and mapped against recommendations. Results Twenty-two records featuring recommendations and 15 valuation studies were included. A 15-item framework of emerging best practice recommendations for collaborative engagement was synthesised. Most examples of collaborative engagement involved patients and/or experts helping inform health states for valuation. There was no evidence for 9 out of 15 synthesised recommendations having been applied in any of the valuation studies and only minimal evidence was extracted for the remaining six. Conclusions Collaborative engagement in health state valuation is underdeveloped and unaligned with literature recommendations. A 15-point framework has been developed as a strategic starting point for developing guidance to improve practice in the field
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.3MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1007/s40273-025-01550-8
Authors
- Publisher:
- Springer
- Journal:
- PharmacoEconomics More from this journal
- Publication date:
- 2025-11-10
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1179-2027
- ISSN:
-
1170-7690
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
2338366
- UUID:
-
uuid_b86d3d8d-df65-4d30-bdeb-e43c0875121d
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2338366
- Source identifiers:
-
W4416068433
- Deposit date:
-
2025-12-01
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record