Journal article
A simplified 4-site economical intradermal post-exposure rabies vaccine regimen: a randomised controlled comparison with standard methods
- Abstract:
- Background: The need for economical rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is increasing in developing countries. Implementation of the two currently approved economical intradermal (ID) vaccine regimens is restricted due to confusion over different vaccines, regimens and dosages, lack of confidence in intradermal technique, and pharmaceutical regulations. We therefore compared a simplified 4-site economical PEP regimen with standard methods. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-four volunteers were randomly allocated to a single blind controlled trial. Each received purified vero cell rabies vaccine by one of four PEP regimens: the currently accepted 2-site ID; the 8-site regimen using 0.05 ml per ID site; a new 4-site ID regimen (on day 0, approximately 0.1 ml at 4 ID sites, using the whole 0.5 ml ampoule of vaccine; on day 7, 0.1 ml ID at 2 sites and at one site on days 28 and 90); or the standard 5-dose intramuscular regimen. All ID regimens required the same total amount of vaccine, 60% less than the intramuscular method. Neutralising antibody responses were measured five times over a year in 229 people, for whom complete data were available. Findings: All ID regimens showed similar immunogenicity. The intramuscular regimen gave the lowest geometric mean antibody titres. Using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test, some sera had unexpectedly high antibody levels that were not attributable to previous vaccination. The results were confirmed using the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation method. Conclusions: This 4-site PEP regimen proved as immunogenic as current regimens, and has the advantages of requiring fewer clinic visits, being more practicable, and having a wider margin of safety, especially in inexperienced hands, than the 2-site regimen. It is more convenient than the 8-site method, and can be used economically with vaccines formulated in 1.0 or 0.5 ml ampoules. The 4-site regimen now meets all requirements of immunogenicity for PEP and can be introduced without further studies. Trial Registration: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN 30087513
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 274.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000224
Authors
+ UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
More from this funder
- Funding agency for:
- Fooks, A
- Brookes, S
- Grant:
- SEV3500
- SEV3500
- Publisher:
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Journal:
- PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases More from this journal
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 4
- Article number:
- e224
- Publication date:
- 2008-04-01
- Edition:
- Publisher's version
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1935-2735
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:b83f88ac-f97e-4881-b4d6-613f927f6b37
- Local pid:
-
ora:2379
- Deposit date:
-
2008-10-10
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Warrell et al
- Copyright date:
- 2008
- Notes:
- Citation: Warrell, M. J. et al. (2008). 'A simplified 4-site economical intradermal post-exposure rabies vaccine regimen: a randomised controlled comparison with standard methods', PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2(4), e224. [Available at http://www.plosntds.org]. Copyright 2008 Warrell et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record