Journal article icon

Journal article

Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials.

Abstract:

Background

Feasibility and pilot studies are essential components of planning or preparing for a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT). They are intended to provide useful information about the feasibility of the main RCT—with the goal of reducing uncertainty and thereby increasing the chance of successfully conducting the main RCT. However, research has shown that there are serious inadequacies in the reporting of pilot and feasibility studies. Reasons for this include a lack of explicit publication policies for pilot and feasibility studies in many journals, unclear definitions of what constitutes a pilot or feasibility RCT/study, and a lack of clarity in the objectives and methodological focus. All these suggest that there is an urgent need for new guidelines for reporting pilot and feasibility studies.

Objectives

The aim of this paper is to describe the methods and processes in our development of an extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement for reporting pilot and feasibility RCTs, that are executed in preparation for a future, more definitive RCT.

Methods/design

There were five overlapping parts to the project: (i) the project launch—which involved establishing a working group and conducting a review of the literature; (ii) stakeholder engagement—which entailed consultation with the CONSORT group, journal editors and publishers, the clinical trials community, and funders; (iii) a Delphi process—used to assess the agreement of experts on initial definitions and to generate a reporting checklist for pilot RCTs, based on the 2010 CONSORT statement extension applicable to reporting pilot studies; (iv) a consensus meeting—to discuss, add, remove, or modify checklist items, with input from experts in the field; and (v) write-up and implementation—which included a guideline document which gives an explanation and elaboration (E&E;) and which will provide advice for each item, together with examples of good reporting practice. This final part also included a plan for dissemination and publication of the guideline.

Conclusions

We anticipate that implementation of our guideline will improve the reporting completeness, transparency, and quality of pilot RCTs, and hence benefit several constituencies, including authors of journal manuscripts, funding agencies, educators, researchers, and end-users.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1186/s40814-016-0065-z

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Centre for Statistics in Medicine
Role:
Author



Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
Pilot and Feasibility Studies More from this journal
Volume:
2
Issue:
1
Pages:
25
Publication date:
2016-05-01
Acceptance date:
2016-05-07
DOI:
ISSN:
2055-5784


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:667168
UUID:
uuid:b7f5d714-bb04-40cd-9cd4-461c71e3c260
Local pid:
pubs:667168
Source identifiers:
667168
Deposit date:
2017-04-03
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP