Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

The postoperative analgesic efficacy of three peripheral nerve blocks in hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Abstract:
Introduction: Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery is often supplemented with a peripheral nerve block (PNB) to reduce postoperative pain. Common PNBs include fascia-iliaca compartment block (FICB) and femoral nerve block (FNB). Since the introduction of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, debate continues as to which technique provides superior analgesia. This review aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of three PNBs when administered perioperatively to adult hip fracture patients. Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched in April 2025. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results: 19 randomised trials (1059 patients) were included. Pain scores between PENG and FICB at 6, 12 and 24 h were not significantly different. Compared to FNB, PENG significantly lowered pain scores at 6 h (P = 0.004). Opioid consumption in the 24 h postoperative period was significantly lower in PENG than FICB (P = 0.02), but not in FNB. No outcome reached the minimal clinically important difference. Evidence was graded very low to moderate. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to state superiority of PENG over FICB or FNB when used perioperatively in patients undergoing hip fracture repair. No included studies reported time to mobilisation, highlighting a significant evidence gap in existing primary research. Further high-quality, sufficiently powered randomised trials are still needed.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1007/s00402-025-06139-6

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery More from this journal
Volume:
146
Issue:
1
Article number:
24
Publication date:
2026-01-06
Acceptance date:
2025-11-18
DOI:
EISSN:
1434-3916
ISSN:
0936-8051


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2360293
Local pid:
pubs:2360293
Source identifiers:
3634647
Deposit date:
2026-01-06
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP