Journal article
The No-men of England: The Geordie revolt that defeated the Scotland and Wales Bill in 1977
- Abstract:
- The Scotland and Wales Acts 1978 failed on multiple criteria. Although devolution of powers to Scotland and Wales was a principal policy of the Labour governments in office from 1974 to 1979, it was defeated in a guillotine vote in 1977. That defeat was orchestrated by the leaders of Tyne & Wear County Council, angry that a government of their own party was apparently neglecting their region in favour of Scotland. The project was rescued in two separate bills, but a further rebel amendment inserted a minimum assent condition in the required referendums. The people of Wales rejected the devolution they were offered. The people of Scotland accepted it, but by a margin that failed to cross the threshold. The resulting vote of confidence brought down the Labour government in March 1979. The role of Tyne & Wear County Council in killing the first bill has never been fully acknowledged. The lessons of the story for current devolution policy are explored. If the UK remains a single country, any policy for tax transfers must be fair to the English as well as to the people of the other three territories.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 467.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/1467-923X.12268
Authors
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- Journal:
- Political Quarterly More from this journal
- Volume:
- 87
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 601–608
- Publication date:
- 2016-06-09
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-04-15
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1467-923X
- ISSN:
-
0032-3179
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:616325
- UUID:
-
uuid:b48c7a26-a453-4a67-861a-8d6d404c9f68
- Local pid:
-
pubs:616325
- Source identifiers:
-
616325
- Deposit date:
-
2016-07-13
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- McLean, I
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- © The Author 2016. The Political Quarterly © The Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd. 2016 Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Wiley at: [10.1111/1467-923X.12268]
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record