Book section icon

Book section

Six Notes on Latin Correlatives

Abstract:
This chapter raises several interrelated questions and makes some observations concerning the Latin 'relative-correlative' construction: quos ferro trucidari oportebat, eos nondum uoce uolnero (Cicero, Cat. 1. 9) '(Those) who ought to have been put to death by the sword, them I am not (even) wounding with my voice yet.' Our central concern is the chronological distribution of the construction. It has often been noted that relative-correlative sentences are most plentiful in early Latin texts and appear to decline in frequency thereafter: they are less common but still clearly present in classical texts and then distinctly rare after the classical period, in both high-register and low-register texts. This is a curious chronological distribution. Did the construction decline sharply after the classical period because it counted as substandard or because it became too difficult to produce? Neither explanation makes obvious sense: it is difficult to see how a construction used by Cicero in his speeches could have come to count as substandard, yet it is also difficult to see how a high-register construction could have fallen out of use even among highly classicising late writers. The explanation for the overall decline of the construction has most often been seen in the widespread but by no means universal idea that Proto-Indo-European relative clauses were exclusively of the relative-correlative type. We do not take this explanation to be self-evidently sufficient, and one of us has argued elsewhere against the idea that all relative clauses in Proto-Indo-European were of the correlative type. We therefore think it worth asking once again quite why the relative-correlative construction declined in Latin. In order to do so, we raise a question about the synchronic structure of the construction (Note 1) and provide some evidence that this construction does indeed have the chronological distribution just outlined (Note 2). Notes 3 – 6 more directly address the reasons for the observed decline in frequency.
Publication status:
In press
Peer review status:
Reviewed (other)

Actions


Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Linguistics Philology and Phonetics Faculty
Oxford college:
Wolfson College
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Reading
Role:
Author

Contributors

Role:
Editor
Role:
Editor


Host title:
Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change?
Edition:
Accepted Manuscript


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subjects:
UUID:
uuid:b39992c2-ddd8-4a69-8fa5-ba724ff5d74a
Local pid:
ora:12144
Deposit date:
2015-08-13


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP