Journal article icon

Journal article

The Soil Erosion Paradox Re‐Examined: Alluviation and Land Use History in a Small British Lowland River Catchment in the Late Holocene

Abstract:
Modern studies show that soil erosion results in a loss of ecosystem function, particularly fertility, and is a cause of declining agricultural yields. However, despite the well‐attested high rates of soil erosion across Roman and medieval Europe there appears to have been little or no soil‐associated decline in agricultural production—the soil erosion paradox. Small low‐slope erodible lowland catchments offer the opportunity to examine this question when sufficient historical information is available. Here, we show that, since its disconnection from the main River Severn (UK) floodplain in the mid‐Holocene, the small Hatfield Brook catchment experienced high rates of soil erosion and alluviation (~2 mm year−1) associated with extensive catchment‐bound open‐field system agrarianism. Scientific and historical data both indicate increases in activity during the early medieval and medieval periods, associated with landscape control by the Bishopric of Worcester (BoW). Agricultural expansion by the church from the late 11th to mid‐13th centuries ad extended further into lower valley slopes and alluviated flatlands, tilled using the heavy plough, and catchment hinterlands were further cleared of woodland via assarting, all leading to greater soil erosion. After ad 1250, the power and influence of the Bishopric of Worcester declined with arable cultivation and a move towards pastoralism leading to a reduction in soil erosion, increased slope stability and floodplain deposition. This suggests that in the low‐relief erodible lowlands of Europe one solution to the erosion paradox is that most of the sediment generated by open‐field cultivation was trapped in the basin and created new, flat, and highly productive agricultural land producing both a sustainable farming system and a non‐linearity in the relationship between population and soil erosion. Further modelling‐based research is needed though to identify the relative role of the manipulation of fertility through manuring and new land‐creation.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1002/gea.70041

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2124-2514
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0934-1931
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8914-0998
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7602-5285
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6369-8309


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Geoarchaeology More from this journal
Volume:
41
Issue:
1
Article number:
e70041
Publication date:
2026-01-02
Acceptance date:
2025-12-22
DOI:
EISSN:
1520-6548
ISSN:
0883-6353


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
3623750
Deposit date:
2026-01-03
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP