Book section icon

Book section

Representational Development Need Not Be Explicable-By-Content

Abstract:
Fodor’s radical concept nativism flowed from his view that hypothesis testing is the only route to concept acquisition. Many have successfully objected to the overly-narrow restriction to learning by hypothesis testing. Existing representations can be connected to a new representational vehicle so as to constitute a sustaining mechanism for the new representation, without the new representation thereby being constituted by or structured out of the old. This paper argues that there is also a deeper objection. Connectionism shows that a more fundamental assumption underpinning the debate can also be rejected: the assumption that the development of a new representation must be explained in content-involving terms if innateness is to be avoided. Fodor has argued that connectionism offers no new resources to explain concept acquisition: unless it is merely an uninteresting claim about neural implementation, connectionism’s defining commitment to distributed representations reduces to the claim that some representations are structured out of others (which is the old, problematic research programme). Examination of examples of representational development in connectionist networks shows, however, that some such models explain the development of new representational capacities in non-representational terms. They illustrate the possibility of representational development that is not explicable-by-content. Connectionist representations can be distributed in an important sense, which is incompatible with the assumption of explanation-by-content: they can be distributed over non-representational resources that account for their development. Rejecting the assumption of explanation-by-content thereby opens up a more radical way of rejecting Fodor’s argument for radical concept nativism.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_14

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Sub department:
Philosophy-NonPostholders
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2032-5705

Contributors

Role:
Editor


Publisher:
Springer
Host title:
Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence
Volume:
376
Pages:
223-240
Series:
Synthese Library
Publication date:
2016-06-08
DOI:
ISBN:
9783319264851


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:926114
UUID:
uuid:b22b57e4-5f5e-4a11-8f60-7d264f22d1e7
Local pid:
pubs:926114
Source identifiers:
926114
Deposit date:
2018-10-10

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP