Journal article icon

Journal article

Combinations of scleroderma hallmark autoantibodies associate with distinct clinical phenotypes

Abstract:
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by the presence of SSc-specific or SSc-associated antibodies (SSc-Abs): anti-topoisomerase I (ATA), anti-centromere (ACA), anti-RNA polymerase III (ARA), anti-U3RNP (U3RNP), anti-U1RNP (U1RNP), anti-PmScl (PmScl), anti-Ku (Ku) and anti-Th/To (Th/To), each being associated with specific clinical features and prognosis. The detection of more than one SSc-Abs in SSc patients is rare and only few data about these patients' clinical phenotype is available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency and the disease's features associated with the presence of > 1 SSc-Abs positivity in a large cohort of SSc patients. The autoantibody profiles of 2799 SSc patients from February 2001 to June 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with > 1 SSc-Abs were identified. Clinical features were collected and compared to a large historical cohort of SSc patients with single SSc-Ab positivity. SSc patients were excluded if previously treated with rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins or stem cell transplantation. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. Nearly 5% of SSc patients from our cohort had ≥ 2 autoantibody positivity, and 2.3% (n = 72) had ≥ 2 SSc-Abs positivity. Th e most common combination was U1RNP and ATA (35%). These patients were younger than patients with single autoantibody positivity and showed more commonly a diffuse cutaneous SSc form. They also had higher rates of overlap features compared to ATA patients. Other combinations included U1RNP and ACA (13%), ATA and ACA (7%) and U1RNP and PmScl (5%). In our study we observed that, while infrequently, SSc patients can present with a combination of two SSc-Abs and that the double positivity can influence their clinical phenotype compared to patients with single SSc-Ab positivity. The importance of re-testing SSc-Abs in patients with changing clinical phenotypes was also highlighted, as this may confer a differing risk stratification
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5926-3900
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-6806-3794
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3480-7251
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1570-9704


Publisher:
Nature Research
Journal:
Scientific Reports More from this journal
Volume:
12
Issue:
1
Pages:
11212-11212
Publication date:
2022-07-02
DOI:
EISSN:
2045-2322
ISSN:
2045-2322


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2372371
Local pid:
pubs:2372371
Source identifiers:
W4283781087
Deposit date:
2026-06-09
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP