Journal article
Identifying direct risk factors in UK Biobank via simultaneous Bayesian-frequentist model-averaged hypothesis testing using Doublethink
- Abstract:
- Big data approaches to discovering nongenetic risk factors have lagged behind genome-wide association studies that routinely uncover novel genetic risk factors for diverse diseases. Instead, epidemiology typically focuses on candidate risk factors. Since modern biobanks contain thousands of potential risk factors, candidate approaches may introduce bias, inadequately control for multiple testing, and overlook important signals. Doublethink, a model-averaged hypothesis testing approach, offers a solution that simultaneously controls the Bayesian false discovery rate (FDR) and frequentist familywise error rate (FWER) while accounting for uncertainty in variable selection. Here, we investigate direct risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalization from among 1,912 variables in 201,917 UK Biobank participants by implementing a Doublethink-based exposome-wide association study using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Focusing on the 2020 outbreak, we find nine individual variables and seven groups of variables exposome-wide significant at 9% FDR and 0.05% FWER. We identify significant direct effects among relatively overlooked risk factors including aging, dementia, and prior infection, which we evaluate in relation to studies of other populations. We detect significant direct effects among some commonly reported risk factors like age, sex, and obesity, but not others like cardiovascular disease. The effects of hypertension, depression, and diabetes appeared to be mediated via general comorbidity. Doublethink produces interchangeable posterior odds and P-values for individual variables and arbitrary groups, facilitating flexible and powerful post hoc hypothesis testing. We discuss the potential for impact and limitations of joint Bayesian-frequentist hypothesis testing, including the benefits of an agnostic exposome-wide approach to discovery.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.7MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1073/pnas.2514138122
Authors
+ National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU)
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://doi.org/10.13039/100018336
+ Royal Society (The Royal Society)
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000288
+ Robertson Foundation (The Robertson Foundation)
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://doi.org/10.13039/100013961
- Publisher:
- National Academy of Sciences
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences More from this journal
- Volume:
- 123
- Issue:
- 1
- Article number:
- e2514138122
- Publication date:
- 2026-01-02
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-11-09
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1091-6490
- ISSN:
-
0027-8424
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Source identifiers:
-
3623160
- Deposit date:
-
2026-01-02
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record