Journal article icon

Journal article

Long-period Transit Searches Should Use a Wider Range of Durations

Abstract:
We present a method for computing upper and lower limits to the expected duration of planetary transits given a range for the parameters of the host star, while explicitly accounting for non-zero impact parameter and eccentricity, and placing a basic constraint on the orbital stability through a minimum planet–star separation at periastron. We find that, especially at longer periods, the transit can be considerably shorter or longer than previous searches have assumed. No transits are known with such short or long transit durations, but it is unclear whether this is a real feature of the planet population or a combination of transit probability, observational bias, and detection bias.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.3847/2515-5172/ae2305

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Physics
Sub department:
Physics - Central
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4787-2335
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Physics
Sub department:
Physics - Central
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1453-0574
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6492-2085
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-3259-2771


Publisher:
IOP Publishing
Journal:
Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society More from this journal
Volume:
9
Issue:
11
Article number:
319
Publication date:
2025-11-25
Acceptance date:
2025-11-21
DOI:
EISSN:
2515-5172
ISSN:
2515-5172


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2335513
UUID:
uuid_ad7e972e-e517-419e-89f3-67d9da439968
Local pid:
pubs:2335513
Source identifiers:
3507075
Deposit date:
2025-11-25
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP