The principle of the malevolent hiding hand; or, the planning fallacy writ large

Journal article

We identify and document a new principle of economic behavior: the principle of the Malevolent Hiding Hand. In a famous discussion, Albert Hirschman celebrated the Hiding Hand, which he saw as a benevolent mechanism by which unrealistically optimistic planners embark on unexpectedly challenging plans, only to be rescued by human ingenuity, which they could not anticipate, but which ultimately led to success, principally in the form of unexpectedly high net benefits. Studying eleven projects, Hirschman suggested that the Hiding Hand is a general phenomenon. But the Benevolent Hiding Hand has an evil twin, the Malevolent Hiding Hand, which blinds excessively optimistic planners not only to unexpectedly high costs but also to unexpectedly low net benefits. Studying a much larger sample than Hirschman did, we find that the Malevolent Hiding Hand is common and that the phenomenon that Hirschman identified is rare. This sobering finding suggests that Hirschman’s phenomenon is a special case; it attests to the pervasiveness of the planning fallacy, writ very large. One implication involves the continuing need to de-bias decisions and decision support tools like cost-benefit analysis; another is that accountability for decision makers, planners, and forecasters is required for such de-biasing to be effective and lasting.

Authors: Flyvbjerg, B; Sunstein, C

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Johns Hopkins University
• Journal: Social Research
• Volume: 83
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 979-1004
• Publication date: 2017-02-01
• ISSN: 0037-783X
• Keywords: behavioral economics; planning fallacy; unintended consequences; Hiding Hand; Malevolent Hiding Hand