Marr v Collie: the ballooning of the common intention constructive trust

Journal article

The decision in Marr v Collie represents a significant expansion of the common intention constructive trust doctrine. Unsupported by authority, it relaxes the requirement that the property be acquired for a ‘domestic’ purpose, and widens the doctrine to encompass all property, whether real or personal. The decision's abrogation of the ‘purpose’ restriction redraws the line between the common intention constructive trust doctrine and the presumed resulting trust doctrine and expands the former to the greatest possible extent. This exacerbates a doctrine already apt to adversely affect both individual litigants and the justice system as a whole, and which creates incongruous theoretical divisions within the law of intentionally created trusts. As the doctrine is reliant on the proposition, unsupported by authority or legislation, that conveyance of a title to land into joint names necessarily gives rise to a trust, it is hoped that a future apex court will reconsider the doctrine's proper scope.

Authors: Georgiou, A

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Wiley
• Journal: Modern Law Review
• Volume: 82
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 145-158
• Publication date: 2019-01-04
• Acceptance date: 2019-01-04
• DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12392
• EISSN: 1468-2230
• ISSN: 0026-7961
• Language: English
• Keywords: FFR