Conference item icon

Conference item : Presentation

Keynote lecture - benevolent and malevolent unintended consequences of open science

Abstract:

Justifications for open science include:
1. It fosters transparency and reproducibility.
2. It makes access to research more equitable.
3. It increases the value of data by making it reusable. 

My talk will focus on another benefit that hasn't usually featured in discussions of open science, namely its role in detecting and preventing research fraud. I will present some examples where fraud was detected because data, scripts and/or peer reviews were openly available. 

Discussions of fraud must also, unfortunately, consider use of open data by paper millers and other fraudsters, who seize the opportunity to churn out low-quality formulaic articles. Should we make data less open to prevent such abuse, or are there other solutions? 

Actions

Access Document

Files:

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Oxford college:
St John's College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2448-4033


Publisher:
Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publication date:
2026-03-04
Event title:
Oxford Forum of Open Scholarship 2026
Event location:
Weston Library, University of Oxford
Event website:
https://openaccess.ox.ac.uk/oxfos
Event start date:
2026-03-02
Event end date:
2026-03-06
DOI:


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subjects:
Subtype:
Presentation
Pubs id:
2395964
Local pid:
pubs:2395964
Deposit date:
2026-03-27
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP