Conference item : Presentation
Keynote lecture - benevolent and malevolent unintended consequences of open science
- Abstract:
-
Justifications for open science include:
1. It fosters transparency and reproducibility.
2. It makes access to research more equitable.
3. It increases the value of data by making it reusable.My talk will focus on another benefit that hasn't usually featured in discussions of open science, namely its role in detecting and preventing research fraud. I will present some examples where fraud was detected because data, scripts and/or peer reviews were openly available.
Discussions of fraud must also, unfortunately, consider use of open data by paper millers and other fraudsters, who seize the opportunity to churn out low-quality formulaic articles. Should we make data less open to prevent such abuse, or are there other solutions?
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.9MB, Terms of use)
-
Authors
- Publisher:
- Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford
- Place of publication:
- Oxford
- Publication date:
- 2026-03-04
- Event title:
- Oxford Forum of Open Scholarship 2026
- Event location:
- Weston Library, University of Oxford
- Event website:
- https://openaccess.ox.ac.uk/oxfos
- Event start date:
- 2026-03-02
- Event end date:
- 2026-03-06
- DOI:
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- Subtype:
-
Presentation
- Pubs id:
-
2395964
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2395964
- Deposit date:
-
2026-03-27
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Dorothy Bishop
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Notes:
-
Presented to the Oxford Forum of Open Scholarship 2026, 2-6 March 2026, University of Oxford.
A recording of the presentation is available at: https://go.glam.ox.ac.uk/OxFOS26-KeynoteLecture
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record