Journal article
Trust and fertility dynamics.
- Abstract:
- We argue that the divergence in fertility trends in advanced societies is influenced by the interaction of long-standing differences in generalized trust with the increase in women's educational attainment. Our argument builds on the idea that trust enhances individuals' and couples' willingness to outsource childcare to outside their extended family. This becomes critically important as women's increased education enhances the demand for combining work and family life. We test our hypothesis using data from the World Values Survey and European Values Study on 36 industrialized countries between the years 1981 and 2009. Multilevel statistical analyses reveal that the interaction between national-level generalized trust and cohort-level women's education is positively associated with completed fertility. As education among women expands, high levels of generalized trust moderate fertility decline.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 575.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/sf/sow080
Authors
+ Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
More from this funder
- Grant:
- T-32HD007514
+ Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research
More from this funder
- Funding agency for:
- Billari, F
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- Social Forces More from this journal
- Volume:
- 95
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 663-692
- Publication date:
- 2016-11-07
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-08-30
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1534-7605
- ISSN:
-
0037-7732
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:667882
- UUID:
-
uuid:ac22df5a-d185-4ba6-9aac-570c15b7df1d
- Local pid:
-
pubs:667882
- Source identifiers:
-
667882
- Deposit date:
-
2017-02-17
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Aassve et al
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Oxford University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow080
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record