Journal article
Who backs universities? Public attitudes and contemporary backlash
- Abstract:
- This paper examines whether rising political critiques of higher education reflect a broader public backlash against universities in advanced democracies. Drawing on an original fivecountry survey—including observational and experimental components—it investigates three questions: who is more critical of universities, where such divisions are sharper, and why citizens hold these views. The results show that while overall support for universities remains widespread, attitudes are strongly structured by cultural orientations rather than material interests. Socially conservative voters, particularly in the United States and United Kingdom, are more sceptical of universities’ social and cultural roles, but they do not reject them wholesale. Experimental evidence reveals no generalized hostility: across contexts, most respondents prefer positive over negative arguments, with conservatives adopting more selective, less “bundled” positions than liberals. The findings suggest that ideological divides are real but asymmetrical, suggesting the critical role of different political contexts in shaping backlash.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.1MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/03050068.2026.2663256
Authors
+ European Research Council
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/0472cxd90
- Grant:
- 759188
- Publisher:
- Taylor & Francis
- Journal:
- Comparative Education More from this journal
- Publication date:
- 2026-05-27
- Acceptance date:
- 2026-03-13
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1360-0486
- ISSN:
-
0305-0068
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2409349
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2409349
- Deposit date:
-
2026-04-20
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Jane Gingrich
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record