Journal article

Discussion of “on the pointlessness of machine learning based time delayed prediction of TBM operational data” by Georg H. Erharter and Thomas Marcher

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Reviewed (other)

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Sheil, B. (2021). Discussion of “on the pointlessness of machine learning based time delayed prediction of TBM operational data” by Georg H. Erharter and Thomas Marcher. Automation in Construction, 124.

MLA Style

Sheil, B. “Discussion of ‘on the Pointlessness of Machine Learning Based Time Delayed Prediction of TBM Operational Data’ by Georg H. Erharter and Thomas Marcher.” Automation in Construction, vol. 124, Elsevier, 2021.

Chicago Style

Sheil, B. 2021. “Discussion of ‘on the Pointlessness of Machine Learning Based Time Delayed Prediction of TBM Operational Data’ by Georg H. Erharter and Thomas Marcher.” Automation in Construction 124.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: Sheil_2021_Discussion_TBM_operational.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, 133.2KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103559

Authors

+ Sheil, B More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: MPLS
Department:: Engineering Science
Role:: Author
ORCID:: 0000-0002-1462-1401

Publisher:: Elsevier
Journal:: Automation in Construction More from this journal
Volume:: 124
Article number:: 103559
Publication date:: 2021-01-22
DOI:: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103559
ISSN:: 0926-5805

Language:: English
Keywords:: FFR
Pubs id:: 1159465
Local pid:: pubs:1159465
Deposit date:: 2021-02-17

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Elsevier B.V.
Copyright date:: 2021
Rights statement:: © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Notes:: This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103559

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP