Journal article
Negative capital: A generalised definition and application to educational effectiveness and equity
- Abstract:
- 
		
			The concept of capital has risen in prominence within educational policy and practice in the UK since Ofsted introduced cultural capital into its inspection processes in 2019. At the same time, fractured discourses exist across different types of capital – one of which concerns capitals that are negative in constitution and/or impact. This paper addresses both through: - 
A systematic literature review of these negativities (in social, economic, and intellectual capital) and a thematic analysis of these papers, leading to the derivation of a definition of negative capital. 
- 
An evaluation of the merit of negative capital via its compatibility with Bourdieu’s concepts of social field, social field homology, habitus, and hysteresis. 
- 
The application of negative capital to a range of examples from educational practice and theory, including a challenge to Ofsted’s use of cultural capital. 
 
- 
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
- 
                - 
                        
                        (Preview, Accepted manuscript, 564.3KB, Terms of use)
 
- 
                        
                        
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1080/03054985.2020.1835626
Authors
- Publisher:
- Taylor & Francis
- Journal:
- Oxford Review of Education More from this journal
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 316-334
- Publication date:
- 2020-11-18
- Acceptance date:
- 2020-10-02
- DOI:
- EISSN:
- 
                    1465-3915
- ISSN:
- 
                    0305-4985
- Language:
- 
                    English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
- 
                  1137214
- Local pid:
- 
                    pubs:1137214
- Deposit date:
- 
                    2020-10-12
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
- Copyright date:
- 2020
- Rights statement:
- © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
- Notes:
- 
              This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Taylor and Francis at https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1835626
 
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record