- Abstract:
-
Genome‐wide sequencing may generate secondary findings (SFs). It is recommended that validated, clinically actionable SFs are reported back to patients/research participants. To explore publics’ perspectives on the best ways to do this, we performed a vignette study among Finnish adults. Our aim was to explore how lay people react to different types of hypothetical genomic SFs. Participants received a hypothetical letter revealing a SF predisposing to a severe but actionable disease—cardiovas...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Publisher:
- Springer Verlag Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Journal of Genetic Counseling Journal website
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 343-354
- Publication date:
- 2018-12-14
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-08-02
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-3599
- ISSN:
-
1059-7700
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:908819
- URN:
-
uri:a9651212-85f2-4d19-9c17-c53f1a023b92
- UUID:
-
uuid:a9651212-85f2-4d19-9c17-c53f1a023b92
- Local pid:
- pubs:908819
- Copyright holder:
- National Society of Genetic Counselors
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
-
Copyright © National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2018. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Wiley at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0288-7
Journal article
Lay perspectives on receiving different types of genomic secondary findings: a qualitative vignette study
Actions
Authors
Funding
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record