Journal article icon

Journal article

Lay perspectives on receiving different types of genomic secondary findings: a qualitative vignette study

Abstract:

Genome‐wide sequencing may generate secondary findings (SFs). It is recommended that validated, clinically actionable SFs are reported back to patients/research participants. To explore publics’ perspectives on the best ways to do this, we performed a vignette study among Finnish adults. Our aim was to explore how lay people react to different types of hypothetical genomic SFs. Participants received a hypothetical letter revealing a SF predisposing to a severe but actionable disease—cardiovas...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1007/s10897-018-0288-7

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
Population Health
Role:
Author
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Haukkala, A
Grant:
275033
Publisher:
Springer Verlag Publisher's website
Journal:
Journal of Genetic Counseling Journal website
Volume:
28
Issue:
2
Pages:
343-354
Publication date:
2018-12-14
Acceptance date:
2018-08-02
DOI:
EISSN:
1573-3599
ISSN:
1059-7700
Source identifiers:
908819

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP