Journal article

Conscientious objection, conflicts of interests, and choosing the right analogies: a reply to Pruski

Abstract:: In this response paper, we respond to the criticisms that Michal Pruski raised against our article “Beyond Money: Conscientious Objection in Medicine as a Conflict of Interests.” We defend our original position against conscientious objection in healthcare by suggesting that the analogies Pruski uses to criticize our paper miss the relevant point and that some of the analogies he uses and the implications he draws are misplaced.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Giubilini, A., & Savulescu, J. (2021). Conscientious objection, conflicts of interests, and choosing the right analogies: a reply to Pruski. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 18(2021), 181–185.

MLA Style

Giubilini, A., and J. Savulescu. “Conscientious Objection, Conflicts of Interests, and Choosing the Right Analogies: a Reply to Pruski.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 2021, Springer, 2021, pp. 181–85.

Chicago Style

Giubilini, A, and J Savulescu. 2021. “Conscientious Objection, Conflicts of Interests, and Choosing the Right Analogies: a Reply to Pruski.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 18 (2021): 181–85.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: Giubilini_Savulescu_2020_conscientious_objection_conflicts.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, 263.2KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1007/s11673-021-10089-0

Authors

+ Giubilini, A More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Role:: Author

+ Savulescu, J More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: HUMS
Department:: Philosophy Faculty
Role:: Author

Publisher:: Springer
Journal:: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry More from this journal
Volume:: 18
Issue:: 2021
Pages:: 181-185
Publication date:: 2021-02-04
Acceptance date:: 2020-09-24
DOI:: 10.1007/s11673-021-10089-0
EISSN:: 1872-4353
ISSN:: 1176-7529

Language:: English
Keywords:: FFR
Pubs id:: 1135927
Local pid:: pubs:1135927
Deposit date:: 2020-10-02

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Copyright date:: 2021
Rights statement:: © Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2021
Notes:: This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Springer at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10089-0

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP