Research strategies for biomedical and health informatics. Some thought-provoking and critical proposals to encourage scientific debate on the nature of good research in medical informatics

Haux, R; Kulikowski, C; Bakken, S; De Lusignan, S; Kimura, M; Koch, S; Mantas, J; Maojo, V; Marschollek, M; Martin-Sanchez, F; Martin-Sanchez, F; Moen, A; Park, H; Sarkar, I; Leong, T; McCray, A

Journal article

Research strategies for biomedical and health informatics. Some thought-provoking and critical proposals to encourage scientific debate on the nature of good research in medical informatics

Abstract:: BACKGROUND:Medical informatics, or biomedical and health informatics (BMHI), has become an established scientific discipline. In all such disciplines there is a certain inertia to persist in focusing on well-established research areas and to hold on to well-known research methodologies rather than adopting new ones, which may be more appropriate. OBJECTIVES:To search for answers to the following questions: What are research fields in informatics, which are not being currently adequately addressed, and which methodological approaches might be insufficiently used? Do we know about reasons? What could be consequences of change for research and for education? METHODS:Outstanding informatics scientists were invited to three panel sessions on this topic in leading international conferences (MIE 2015, Medinfo 2015, HEC 2016) in order to get their answers to these questions. RESULTS:A variety of themes emerged in the set of answers provided by the panellists. Some panellists took the theoretical foundations of the field for granted, while several questioned whether the field was actually grounded in a strong theoretical foundation. Panellists proposed a range of suggestions for new or improved approaches, methodologies, and techniques to enhance the BMHI research agenda. CONCLUSIONS:The field of BMHI is on the one hand maturing as an academic community and intellectual endeavour. On the other hand vendor-supplied solutions may be too readily and uncritically accepted in health care practice. There is a high chance that BMHI will continue to flourish as an important discipline; its innovative interventions might then reach the original objectives of advancing science and improving health care outcomes.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Haux, R., Kulikowski, C., Bakken, S., De Lusignan, S., Kimura, M., Koch, S., Mantas, J., Maojo, V., Marschollek, M., Martin-Sanchez, F., Martin-Sanchez, F., Moen, A., Park, H., Sarkar, I., Leong, T., & McCray, A. (2018). Research strategies for biomedical and health informatics. Some thought-provoking and critical proposals to encourage scientific debate on the nature of good research in medical informatics. Methods of Information in Medicine, 56(S01), e1–e10.

MLA Style

Haux, R, et al. “Research Strategies for Biomedical and Health Informatics. Some Thought-Provoking and Critical Proposals to Encourage Scientific Debate on the Nature of Good Research in Medical Informatics.” Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 56, no. S01, 2018, pp. e1–e10.

Chicago Style

Haux, R, C Kulikowski, S Bakken, et al. 2018. “Research Strategies for Biomedical and Health Informatics. Some Thought-Provoking and Critical Proposals to Encourage Scientific Debate on the Nature of Good Research in Medical Informatics.” Methods of Information in Medicine 56 (S01): e1–e10.
Print