Journal article icon

Journal article

Population-representative inference for primary and secondary outcomes in extended case-cohort designs

Abstract:
Background: The case-cohort design is useful for obtaining population-representative inference with smaller samples, but the performance when dealing with secondary outcomes and extended follow-up remains unclear. We compare the case-cohort design with the full-cohort design across various outcomes, including additional case-groups and extended follow-up, illustrated using the iPSYCH study. Methods: From Danish nationwide registers, we identified the full-population cohort of all individuals born 1981–2008 (n = 1,657,449) and their clinical diagnoses until 2021. The iPSYCH case-cohort sample (n = 141,265) includes specific case-groups with specific psychiatric disorders diagnosed 1994–2015 (n = 93,608) and a random-population subcohort (n = 50,615). We applied inverse probability weights to estimate person-years at risk, age-specific incidence rates, absolute risks, and incidence rate ratios in various scenarios for primary outcomes (affective disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, autism, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder) and secondary outcomes (epilepsy, anxiety, migraine, asthma, diabetes, injury, traumatic brain injury, substance use disorder, and death). Results: Weighted estimates based on the iPSYCH sample aligned with those in the full cohort for both primary and secondary outcomes. For example, weighted absolute risks by age 40 were analogous to full-cohort estimates for both affective disorder (7.9% [7.5–8.3] versus 8.0% [7.9–8.1]) and epilepsy (2.3% [2.1–2.5] versus 2.3% [2.2–2.3]). Similarly, weighted incidence rates and incidence rate ratios mimicked full-cohort estimates. Conclusion: The extended case-cohort design yields valid estimates of age-specific incidence rates, absolute risks, person-years at risk, and incidence rate ratios for primary and secondary outcomes, even with multiple case-groups and extended follow-up.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Authors


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03hz8wd80


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Discover Public Health More from this journal
Volume:
22
Issue:
1
Article number:
599
Publication date:
2025-10-08
Acceptance date:
2025-08-13
DOI:
EISSN:
3005-0774
ISSN:
3005-0774


Language:
English
Keywords:
UUID:
uuid_a71e8c4e-20c5-41ce-9f68-a8251e2dea7b
Source identifiers:
3353715
Deposit date:
2025-10-09
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP