Journal article icon

Journal article

Performance of diagnostic procedures for bubonic plague in endemic settings in Madagascar: a prospective test accuracy sub-study within the IMASOY trial

Abstract:

Objective: We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of a battery of confirmatory tests included in the World Health Organisation guidelines for bubonic plague, combined and individually, including culture, PCR and serology and the on-site and laboratory performance of the F1 antigen-based lateral flow rapid diagnostic test (F1RDT).

Methods: Bubo aspirates from patients (all ages) with suspected bubonic plague enrolled into the IMASOY trial (NCT04110340) underwent routine laboratory diagnosis complemented with serology to measure IgG F1 antibodies from blood samples taken on days 1, 11 and 21. The performance of the F1RDT done on site (on-site F1RDT) and at the Central Laboratory for Plague (RL F1RDT) was compared against two gold standards: GS1 (culture or PCR-positive) which is used in routine practice, and GS2 (GS1 and serology-positive) including all available confirmatory tests for plague.

Results: Of 438 suspected cases, 184 (42%) were confirmed by culture or PCR (GS1) and 211 (48%) by culture, PCR, or serology (GS2). PCR identified 179 cases (85%), culture 137 (65%), and serology 197 (93%). The combination of PCR and culture identified 87% of confirmed cases while the remaining 13% were identified by serology only. The sensitivity and specificity of on-site F1RDT were 94% (95%CI: 89.6-97.0) and 74% (95%CI: 68.2-79.3) against GS1 and 89.1% (95%CI: 84.1-93) and 77.5% (95%CI: 71.5-82.8) against GS2. The sensitivity and specificity of RL F1RDT were 91.8% (95%CI: 86.9-95.4), 97.6% (95%CI: 94.9-99.1) against GS1, and 82.0% (95%CI: 76.1-86.9) and 99.1% (95%CI: 96.9-99.9) against GS2.

Conclusion: PCR outperforms culture, the previous gold standard. While serology adds diagnostic value, it is impractical for routine use. The F1RDT done on site cannot be relied upon for clinical case management decisions. F1RDT performs better under laboratory condition and could be implemented in peripheral laboratories for surveillance purposes in resource-constraint settings.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.cmi.2025.12.002

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDM
Sub department:
Tropical Medicine
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDM
Sub department:
Tropical Medicine
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
216273/Z/19/Z


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Clinical Microbiology and Infection More from this journal
Volume:
32
Issue:
4
Pages:
638-643
Publication date:
2025-12-11
Acceptance date:
2025-12-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-0691
ISSN:
1198-743X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2350035
UUID:
uuid_a71c7c46-53fd-48af-8241-d74876107e95
Local pid:
pubs:2350035
Deposit date:
2025-12-15
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP