Journal article icon

Journal article

Tensions and opportunities in social prescribing. Developing a framework to facilitate its implementation and evaluation in primary care: a realist review

Abstract:
Background Frailty increases vulnerability to major health changes because of seemingly small health problems. It affects around 10% of people aged >65 years. Older adults with frailty frequently have multiple long-term conditions, personal challenges, and social problems. Personalised care planning (PCP) based on ‘goal setting’ and ‘action planning’ is a promising way to address the needs of older adults living with frailty. Aim To identify and explore factors that influence the implementation of PCP-style interventions for older adults. Design & setting We conducted a scoping review and identified a small number of interventions that explicitly employed goal setting and action planning. Method We used a range of sources to identify relevant material. We included all interventions inclusive of patients aged ≥65 years and reported in English. We excluded end-of-life care interventions, group education, and/or those that did not involve one-to-one engagement. We explored all related articles that described, examined, or discussed implementation. We constructed a thematic framework in NVivo (version 11). Findings were narratively synthesised. Results We identified 18 potentially relevant PCP-style interventions and 13 of these met the inclusion criteria. Within these, were seven main categories of potentially modifiable influences relevant to older adults with frailty related to the following: primary care engagement; delivery staff characteristics; training; patient engagement; collaborative working; organisation and management; and systems. Conclusion Many modifiable factors can influence the implementation of PCP. We identified several influences that have informed the development and implementation of a novel intervention PeRsOnaliSed care Planning for oldER people with frailty (PROSPER)
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1369-0250
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0375-8629
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2369-8088
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2684-4653


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice Open More from this journal
Volume:
5
Issue:
3
Pages:
BJGPO.2021.0017-BJGPO.2021.0017
Publication date:
2021-04-13
DOI:
EISSN:
2398-3795
ISSN:
2398-3795


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1174395
Local pid:
pubs:1174395
Source identifiers:
W3154598331
Deposit date:
2026-03-24
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP