Journal article
Tensions and opportunities in social prescribing. Developing a framework to facilitate its implementation and evaluation in primary care: a realist review
- Abstract:
- Background Frailty increases vulnerability to major health changes because of seemingly small health problems. It affects around 10% of people aged >65 years. Older adults with frailty frequently have multiple long-term conditions, personal challenges, and social problems. Personalised care planning (PCP) based on ‘goal setting’ and ‘action planning’ is a promising way to address the needs of older adults living with frailty. Aim To identify and explore factors that influence the implementation of PCP-style interventions for older adults. Design & setting We conducted a scoping review and identified a small number of interventions that explicitly employed goal setting and action planning. Method We used a range of sources to identify relevant material. We included all interventions inclusive of patients aged ≥65 years and reported in English. We excluded end-of-life care interventions, group education, and/or those that did not involve one-to-one engagement. We explored all related articles that described, examined, or discussed implementation. We constructed a thematic framework in NVivo (version 11). Findings were narratively synthesised. Results We identified 18 potentially relevant PCP-style interventions and 13 of these met the inclusion criteria. Within these, were seven main categories of potentially modifiable influences relevant to older adults with frailty related to the following: primary care engagement; delivery staff characteristics; training; patient engagement; collaborative working; organisation and management; and systems. Conclusion Many modifiable factors can influence the implementation of PCP. We identified several influences that have informed the development and implementation of a novel intervention PeRsOnaliSed care Planning for oldER people with frailty (PROSPER)
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.4MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0017
Authors
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice Open More from this journal
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- BJGPO.2021.0017-BJGPO.2021.0017
- Publication date:
- 2021-04-13
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2398-3795
- ISSN:
-
2398-3795
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1174395
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1174395
- Source identifiers:
-
W3154598331
- Deposit date:
-
2026-03-24
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record