Journal article
Comparisons across higher education contexts: findings from collaboratively adapting an interfaith diversity study
- Abstract:
- Understanding campus climates for interfaith learning in higher education supports universities in achieving their missions of producing global leaders and ensuring equitable access and experiences of campus life for students of diverse religious and nonreligious worldviews. The Interfaith Diversity Experiences and Attitudes Longitudinal Survey (IDEALS) was a mixed-method study designed to explore these issues in the United States; recently, UK researchers collaborated with US principal investigators to collaboratively adapt IDEALS to the UK higher education environment. First, using the interfaith learning and development framework as a guide, the authors outline what important aspects of the national and institutional contexts the adaptation process considered. Second, the relational aspects of interfaith learning were explored across contexts using a multiple case study approach, which resulted in cross-context assertions about how students in both countries perceived their campus climates, engaged across worldview differences, and encountered insensitivity about worldviews during their university experience.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 432.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1086/739361
Authors
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- Journal:
- Comparative Education Review More from this journal
- Volume:
- 70
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 43-68
- Publication date:
- 2026-02-11
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-10-27
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1545-701X
- ISSN:
-
0010-4086
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2438673
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2438673
- Source identifiers:
-
W7128603622
- Deposit date:
-
2026-06-26
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Comparative and International Education Society.
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- © 2026 Comparative and International Education Society. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial intelligence technologies or similar technologies.
- Notes:
- The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record