Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement

Journal article

Research into cognitive biases that impair human judgment has mostly been applied to the area of economic decision-making. Ethical decision-making has been comparatively neglected. Since ethical decisions often involve very high individual as well as collective stakes, analyzing how cognitive biases affect them can be expected to yield important results. In this theoretical article, we consider the ethical debate about cognitive enhancement (CE) and suggest a number of cognitive biases that are likely to affect moral intuitions and judgments about CE: status quo bias, loss aversion, risk aversion, omission bias, scope insensitivity, nature bias, and optimistic bias. We find that there are more well-documented biases that are likely to cause irrational aversion to CE than biases in the opposite direction. This suggests that common attitudes about CE are predominantly negatively biased. Within this new perspective, we hope that subsequent research will be able to elaborate this hypothesis and develop effective de-biasing techniques that can help increase the rationality of the public CE debate and thus improve our ethical decision-making.

Authors: Caviola, L; Mannino, A; Savulescu, J; Faulmüller, N

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Frontiers Media
• Journal: Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
• Volume: 8
• Article number: 195
• Publication date: 2014-10-15
• Acceptance date: 2014-09-22
• DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00195
• EISSN: 1662-5137
• ISSN: 1662-5137
• Language: English
• Keywords: moral intuitions; cognitive bias; cognitive enhancement; rationality; de-biasing; attitudes; brain function augmentation