Journal article
Identifying the best predictive diagnostic criteria for psoriasis in children (under 18 years): a UK multicentre case–control diagnostic accuracy study (DIPSOC study)
- Abstract:
-
Background
In children, psoriasis can be challenging to diagnose. Difficulties arise from differences in the clinical presentation compared with adults.
Objectives
To test the diagnostic accuracy of previously agreed consensus criteria and to develop a shortlist of the best predictive diagnostic criteria for childhood psoriasis.
Methods
A case–control diagnostic accuracy study in 12 UK dermatology departments (2017–2019) assessed 18 clinical criteria using blinded trained investigators. Children (< 18 years) with dermatologist‐diagnosed psoriasis (cases, N = 170) or a different scaly inflammatory rash (controls, N = 160) were recruited. The best predictive criteria were identified using backward logistic regression, and internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping.
Results
The sensitivity of the consensus‐agreed criteria and consensus scoring algorithm was 84·6%, the specificity was 65·1% and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0·75. The seven diagnostic criteria that performed best were: (i) scale and erythema in the scalp involving the hairline, (ii) scaly erythema inside the external auditory meatus, (iii) persistent well‐demarcated erythematous rash anywhere on the body, (iv) persistent erythema in the umbilicus, (v) scaly erythematous plaques on the extensor surfaces of the elbows and/or knees, (vi) well‐demarcated erythematous rash in the napkin area involving the crural fold and (vii) family history of psoriasis. The sensitivity of the best predictive model was 76·8%, with specificity 72·7% and AUC 0·84. The c‐statistic optimism‐adjusted shrinkage factor was 0·012.
Conclusions
This study provides examination‐ and history‐based data on the clinical features of psoriasis in children and proposes seven diagnostic criteria with good discriminatory ability in secondary‐care patients. External validation is now needed.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 161.5KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 720.7KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/bjd.20689
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- British Journal of Dermatology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 186
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 341-351
- Place of publication:
- England
- Publication date:
- 2021-11-24
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-08-05
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1365-2133
- ISSN:
-
0007-0963
- Pmid:
-
34477218
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
1198736
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1198736
- Deposit date:
-
2025-06-05
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Burden-Teh et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- © 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record