Journal article icon

Journal article

Machine learning reduced workload for the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register: development and evaluation of the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Classifier

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: This study developed, calibrated and evaluated a machine learning (ML) classifier designed to reduce study identification workload in maintaining the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (CCSR), a continuously updated register of COVID-19 research studies. METHODS: A ML classifier for retrieving COVID-19 research studies (the 'Cochrane COVID-19 Study Classifier') was developed using a data set of title-abstract records 'included' in, or 'excluded' from, the CCSR up to 18th October 2020, manually labelled by information and data curation specialists or the Cochrane Crowd. The classifier was then calibrated using a second data set of similar records 'included' in, or 'excluded' from, the CCSR between October 19 and December 2, 2020, aiming for 99% recall. Finally, the calibrated classifier was evaluated using a third data set of similar records 'included' in, or 'excluded' from, the CCSR between the 4th and 19th of January 2021. RESULTS: The Cochrane COVID-19 Study Classifier was trained using 59,513 records (20,878 of which were 'included' in the CCSR). A classification threshold was set using 16,123 calibration records (6005 of which were 'included' in the CCSR) and the classifier had a precision of 0.52 in this data set at the target threshold recall >0.99. The final, calibrated COVID-19 classifier correctly retrieved 2285 (98.9%) of 2310 eligible records but missed 25 (1%), with a precision of 0.638 and a net screening workload reduction of 24.1% (1113 records correctly excluded). CONCLUSIONS: The Cochrane COVID-19 Study Classifier reduces manual screening workload for identifying COVID-19 research studies, with a very low and acceptable risk of missing eligible studies. It is now deployed in the live study identification workflow for the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s13643-021-01880-6
Publication website:
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10144889/1/s13643-021-01880-6.pdf

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4862-2135
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Radcliffe Department of Medicine
Sub department:
RDM-Strategic
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3476-8432
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4805-4190
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2517-2258
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2762-6196


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/02ghpjv23
Grant:
NA


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
Systematic Reviews More from this journal
Volume:
11
Issue:
1
Pages:
15-15
Article number:
15
Publication date:
2022-01-22
DOI:
EISSN:
2046-4053
ISSN:
2046-4053


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1236392
Local pid:
pubs:1236392
Source identifiers:
W4225504932
Deposit date:
2026-04-09
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP