I feel it in my finger: measurement device affects cardiac interoceptive accuracy

Journal article

In recent years, measures of cardiac interoceptive accuracy have been heavily scrutinised. The focus has been on potentially confounding physiological and psychological factors; little research has examined whether the device used to record objective heartbeats may influence cardiac interoceptive accuracy. The present studies assessed whether the device employed influences heartbeat counting (HCT) accuracy and the location from which heartbeats are perceived. In Study One, participants completed the HCT using a hard-clip finger pulse oximeter, electrocardiogram (ECG) and a smartphone application. In Study Two, an ECG, hard-clip and soft-clip oximeter were compared. Moderate-strong correlations were observed across devices, however, mean HCT accuracy and confidence varied as a function of device. Increased sensation in the finger when using a hard-clip pulse oximeter was related to increased accuracy relative to ECG. Results suggest that the device employed can influence HCT performance, and argue against comparing, or combining, scores obtained using different devices.

Authors: Murphy, J; Brewer, R; Coll, M-P; Plans, D; Hall, M

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Journal: Biological Psychology
• Volume: 148
• Article number: 107765
• Publication date: 2019-09-10
• Acceptance date: 2019-09-03
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107765
• EISSN: 1873-6246
• ISSN: 0301-0511
• Language: English
• Keywords: FFR; interoceptive accuracy; pulse oximeter; ECG; heartbeat counting; cardiac interoception; interoception