Journal article icon

Journal article

Minimum efficacy criteria for comparisons between treatments using individual patient meta-analysis of acute pain trials: examples of etoricoxib, paracetamol, ibuprofen/paracetamol combinations after third molar extraction

Abstract:
We defined response in acute pain trials to percentage of maximum possible efficacy. Minimum efficacy criteria (MEC) of 0%, or at least 15%, 30%, 50%, and 70% pain relief were used to examine stability over time using total pain relief and summed pain intensity difference (SPID), sex differences, and sensitivity. We used individual patient data from placebo-controlled third molar extraction trials: 4 with single-dose oral etoriocoxib 120 mg, and 2 with paracetamol, ibuprofen, and ibuprofen plus paracetamol combinations. With etoricoxic, numbers needed to treat (NNTs) were stable between response levels of at least 15% (MEC15) and 50% pain relief (MEC50), and similar for total pain relief and SPID. NNTs were higher (worse) at extremes of MEC, especially with SPID. Results for women and men were similar. NNTs of lower efficacy treatments (paracetamol 500 and 1000 mg) rose rapidly at higher MEC. NNTs of high efficacy treatments (ibuprofen plus paracetamol combinations) showed greater separation at higher MEC. The highest degree of discrimination between treatments was with MEC50 and MEC70. Etoricoxib 120 mg (NNT for ≥ 50% maximum 6-hour pain relief 1.7) and ibuprofen 200/400 mg plus paracetamol 500/1000 mg (NNTs 1.5 and 1.6, respectively) produced the lowest (best) NNTs in the dental pain model. Timing of patient request for additional analgesia is an alternative analgesic efficacy outcome measure.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.030

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
"Pain Research", "University of Oxford"
Department:
Medical Sciences Division - Anaesthetics,Nuffield Department of
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Department:
Department of Occupational and Social Medicine
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
Spreadsheet Factory, Oxford, UK
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
"Pain Research", "University of Oxford"
Department:
Medical Sciences Division - Anaesthetics,Nuffield Department of
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
"Pain Research", "University of Oxford"
Department:
Medical Sciences Division - Anaesthetics,Nuffield Department of
Role:
Author

Contributors


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Pain® More from this journal
Volume:
152
Issue:
5
Pages:
982-989
Publication date:
2011-05-01
DOI:
ISSN:
0304-3959


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subjects:
UUID:
uuid:a0ab5124-9ca5-4191-ae12-320e8c32af10
Local pid:
ora:5441
Deposit date:
2011-06-10
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP