Journal article
Minimum efficacy criteria for comparisons between treatments using individual patient meta-analysis of acute pain trials: examples of etoricoxib, paracetamol, ibuprofen/paracetamol combinations after third molar extraction
- Abstract:
-
We defined response in acute pain trials to percentage of maximum possible efficacy. Minimum efficacy criteria (MEC) of 0%, or at least 15%, 30%, 50%, and 70% pain relief were used to examine stability over time using total pain relief and summed pain intensity difference (SPID), sex differences, and sensitivity. We used individual patient data from placebo-controlled third molar extraction trials: 4 with single-dose oral etoriocoxib 120 mg, and 2 with paracetamol, ibuprofen, and ibuprofen pl...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.030
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Funding
+ National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre Programme
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
R. Andrew Moore
Oxford Pain Relief Trust
More from this funder
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Elsevier Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Pain® Journal website
- Volume:
- 152
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- 982-989
- Publication date:
- 2011-05-05
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0304-3959
- URN:
-
uuid:a0ab5124-9ca5-4191-ae12-320e8c32af10
- Local pid:
- ora:5441
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- International Association for the Study of Pain
- Copyright date:
- 2010
- Notes:
- The full-text of this article is not available in ORA, but you may be able to access the article via the publisher copy link on this record page.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record