Journal article
Minimum efficacy criteria for comparisons between treatments using individual patient meta-analysis of acute pain trials: examples of etoricoxib, paracetamol, ibuprofen/paracetamol combinations after third molar extraction
- Abstract:
-
We defined response in acute pain trials to percentage of maximum possible efficacy. Minimum efficacy criteria (MEC) of 0%, or at least 15%, 30%, 50%, and 70% pain relief were used to examine stability over time using total pain relief and summed pain intensity difference (SPID), sex differences, and sensitivity. We used individual patient data from placebo-controlled third molar extraction trials: 4 with single-dose oral etoriocoxib 120 mg, and 2 with paracetamol, ibuprofen, and ibuprofen pl...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Contributors
Funding
Oxford Pain Relief Trust
More from this funder
+ National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre Programme
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Moore, R
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Elsevier Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Pain® Journal website
- Volume:
- 152
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- 982-989
- Publication date:
- 2011-05-01
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0304-3959
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:a0ab5124-9ca5-4191-ae12-320e8c32af10
- Local pid:
- ora:5441
- Deposit date:
- 2011-06-10
Related Items
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- International Association for the Study of Pain
- Copyright date:
- 2010
- Notes:
- The full-text of this article is not available in ORA, but you may be able to access the article via the publisher copy link on this record page.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record