Journal article icon

Journal article

The usability and reliability of a smartphone application for monitoring future dementia risk in ageing UK adults

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The rising number of dementia diagnoses and imminent adoption of disease-modifying treatments necessitate innovative approaches to identify individuals at risk, monitor disease course and intervene non-pharmacologically earlier in the disease course. Digital assessments of dementia risk and cognitive function have the potential to outperform traditional in-person assessments in terms of their affordability, accuracy and longitudinal tracking abilities. However, their accessibility and reliability in older adults is unclear. AIMS: To evaluate the usability and reliability of a smartphone assessment of lifestyle and cognitive factors relevant to dementia risk in a group of UK-based older adults. METHOD: Cognitively healthy adults (n = 756) recruited through the Dementias Platform UK Great Minds volunteer register completed three assessments of cognitive function and dementia risk over a 3-month period and provided usability feedback on the Five Lives smartphone application (app). We evaluated cognitive test scores for age, gender and higher education effects, normality distributions, test-retest reliability and their relationship with participants' lifestyle dementia risk factors. RESULTS: Participants found the app 'easy to use', 'quick to complete' and 'enjoyable'. The cognitive tests showed normal or near-to-normal distributions, variable test-retest reliabilities and age-related effects. Only tests of verbal ability showed gender and education effects. The cognitive tests did not correlate with lifestyle dementia risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: The Five Lives assessment demonstrates high usability and reliability among older adults. These findings highlight the potential of digital assessments in dementia research and clinical practice, enabling improved accessibility and better monitoring of cognitive health on a larger scale than traditional in-person assessments
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1192/bjp.2024.18

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6079-9323
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8860-0929
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0866-8246
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9243-8258
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0508-0006


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100009187
Grant:
MR/T033371/1


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
The British Journal of Psychiatry More from this journal
Volume:
224
Issue:
6
Pages:
245-251
Publication date:
2024-02-15
DOI:
EISSN:
1472-1465
ISSN:
0007-1250


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1628975
Local pid:
pubs:1628975
Source identifiers:
W4391837960
Deposit date:
2026-06-08
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP