Journal article icon

Journal article

SETI and democracy

Abstract:
There is a wide-ranging debate about the merits and demerits of searching for, and sending messages to, extraterrestrial intelligences (SETI and METI). There is however reasonable (but not universal) consensus that replying to a message from an extraterrestrial intelligence should not be done unilaterally, without consultation with wider society and the rest of the world. But how should this consultation actually work? In this paper we discuss various ways that decision making in such a scenario could be done democratically, and gain legitimacy. In particular we consider a scientist-led response, a politician-led response, deciding a response using a referendum, and finally using citizens’ assemblies. We present the results of a survey of a representative survey of 2000 people in the UK on how they thought a response should best be determined, and finally discuss parallels to how the public is responding to scientific expertise in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.11.053

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Acta Astronautica More from this journal
Volume:
180
Pages:
596-603
Publication date:
2020-12-17
Acceptance date:
2020-11-25
DOI:
ISSN:
0094-5765


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1147501
Local pid:
pubs:1147501
Deposit date:
2020-12-02

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP