Journal article icon

Journal article

Planning for the survival of linguistic diversity

Abstract:
The prospect of the loss of linguistic diversity on a large scale has prompted scholars such as Fishman and others to propose programs of intervention to 'reverse language shift' (RLS). RLS theories and efforts are byproducts of European indigenous minority problems, and the ideological bias of Fishman's model of RLS privileges intergenerational transmission in the context of stable diglossia. This article examines the ideological underpinnings and utility of this framework as an appropriate model for stabilizing and revitalizing indigenous languages. I question the assumptions and theoretical perspectives underlying terms such as RLS and reconceptualize what it might mean for a language to be maintained and survive without intergenerational mother tongue transmission. As an increasing number of communities around the world face the impending loss of their languages, it is imperative to clarify these issues not just for theory's sake, but in the interest of providing sound advice.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1007/s10993-006-9034-3

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Linguistics Philology and Phonetics Faculty
Oxford college:
Merton College
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Language Policy More from this journal
Volume:
5
Issue:
4
Pages:
441-473
Publication date:
2006-11-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1573-1863
ISSN:
1568-4555


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subjects:
UUID:
uuid:9fd6e0b2-74ea-46f3-858e-5025733fdc7f
Local pid:
ora:3506
Deposit date:
2010-03-15
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP