Journal article
Between conformity and innovation: China’s and India’s quest for status as responsible nuclear powers
- Abstract:
- China and India, as rising powers, have been proactive in seeking status as nuclear responsibles. Since the 1990s they have sought to demonstrate conformity with intersubjectively accepted understandings of nuclear responsibility within the global nuclear order, and have also sought recognition on the basis of particularistic practices of nuclear restraint. This article addresses two puzzles. First, nuclear restraint is at the centre of the pursuit of global nuclear order, so why have China and India not received recognition from influential members of the nuclear order for the full spectrum of their restraint-based behaviours? Second, why do China and India nonetheless persist with these behaviours? We argue that the conferral of status as a nuclear responsible is a politicised process shaped by the interests, values and perceptions of powerful stakeholder states in the global nuclear order. China’s and India’s innovations are not incorporated into the currently accepted set of responsible nuclear behaviours because, indirectly, they pose a strategic, political and social challenge to these states. However, China’s and India’s innovations are significant as a lens into their identity-projection and preferred social roles as distinctive rising powers, and as a means of introducing new, if nascent, ideas into non-proliferation practice and governance.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 207.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0260210518000013
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Review of International Studies More from this journal
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 482-503
- Publication date:
- 2018-03-20
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-12-14
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-9044
- ISSN:
-
0260-2105
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:810883
- UUID:
-
uuid:9f7217a9-daf5-4bb4-905e-fccdd92d5a6d
- Local pid:
-
pubs:810883
- Source identifiers:
-
810883
- Deposit date:
-
2017-12-14
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- © British International Studies Association 2018
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: 10.1017/S0260210518000013
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record