Journal article icon

Journal article

The importance of temporal collocation for the evaluation of aerosol models with observations

Abstract:

It is often implicitly assumed that over suitably long periods the mean of observations and models should be comparable, even if they have different temporal sampling. We assess the errors incurred due to ignoring temporal sampling and show that they are of similar magnitude as (but smaller than) actual model errors (20–60 %).

Using temporal sampling from remote-sensing data sets, the satellite imager MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) and the ground-based sun photometer network AERONET (AErosol Robotic NETwork), and three different global aerosol models, we compare annual and monthly averages of full model data to sampled model data. Our results show that sampling errors as large as 100 % in AOT (aerosol optical thickness), 0.4 in AE (Ångström Exponent) and 0.05 in SSA (single scattering albedo) are possible. Even in daily averages, sampling errors can be significant. Moreover these sampling errors are often correlated over long distances giving rise to artificial contrasts between pristine and polluted events and regions. Additionally, we provide evidence that suggests that models will underestimate these errors. To prevent sampling errors, model data should be temporally collocated to the observations before any analysis is made.

We also discuss how this work has consequences for in situ measurements (e.g. aircraft campaigns or surface measurements) in model evaluation.

Although this study is framed in the context of model evaluation, it has a clear and direct relevance to climatologies derived from observational data sets.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.5194/acp-16-1065-2016

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Physics
Sub department:
Atmos Ocean & Planet Physics
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Physics
Sub department:
Atmos Ocean & Planet Physics
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Stier, P
Grant:
ACCLAIM (grant agreement no. FP7-280025


Publisher:
European Geosciences Union
Journal:
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics More from this journal
Volume:
16
Issue:
2
Pages:
1065-1079
Publication date:
2016-01-29
Acceptance date:
2016-01-12
DOI:
ISSN:
1680-7316


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:598658
UUID:
uuid:9e2fedc5-cf9e-4db0-b694-4df79be150d5
Local pid:
pubs:598658
Source identifiers:
598658
Deposit date:
2016-02-03

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP