Journal article
Aboriginal incarceration in Canada since 1978: every picture tells the same story
- Abstract:
- Sentencing in Canada is beset by many problems yet one weakness stands above the rest: the disproportionately high rates of Aboriginal incarceration. This article documents current and historical trends in levels of Aboriginal incarceration at the provincial/territorial and federal levels since 1978. We pay particular attention to the years following two important Supreme Court judgments (in 2001 and 2012) which directed courts to use custody with greater restraint when sentencing an Aboriginal offender. The primary data derive from the annual Adult Correctional Services (ACS) Survey conducted by Statistics Canada. In 2014, Aboriginal persons accounted for just over one quarter of all provincial and territorial admissions, significantly higher than the percentage recorded in 1978 (16%). In fact, over the last 20 years all jurisdictions save one have experienced an increase in the percentage of Aboriginal admissions to provincial correctional institutions. Despite judgments from the Supreme and provincial courts of appeal, and a number of other remedial interventions such as the creation of so-called ‘Gladue’ courts and an alternate form of custody served in the community, the problem of Aboriginal over-incarceration has worsened, not improved.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 561.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3138/cjccj.2016.E24
Authors
- Publisher:
- University of Toronto Press
- Journal:
- Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice More from this journal
- Volume:
- 59
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 313-345
- Publication date:
- 2017-02-24
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-11-13
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1911-0219
- ISSN:
-
1707-7753
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:667098
- UUID:
-
uuid:9e2527a0-36ff-4eb3-801c-9db88a48f8ea
- Local pid:
-
pubs:667098
- Source identifiers:
-
667098
- Deposit date:
-
2016-12-23
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- CJCCJ / RCCJP
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2017 CJCCJ / RCCJP. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from University of Toronto Press at: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2016.E24
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record