Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis

Lamé, G; Liberati, EG; Canham, A; Burt, J; Hinton, L; Draycott, T; Winter, C; Dakin, FH; Richards, N; Miller, L; Willars, J; Dixon-Woods, M

Women's Health Collection

Journal article

Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis

Abstract:: Objectives: Suboptimal intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring using cardiotocography has remained a persistent problem (EFM-CTG). We aimed to identify the range of influences on the safety of using EFM-CTG in practice. Design: Scoping review to identify influences related to the practice of intrapartum EFM. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, British Nursing Index, Cochrane Library, from 1 January 2001 to 25 August 2024, and grey literature. Eligibility criteria: Articles that reported potential influences on the clinical practice of intrapartum EFM-CTG in hospital-based intrapartum maternity care settings, including primary studies, secondary analyses, reviews, reports, conference abstracts and investigations relevant to maternity and obstetrics, in English. Evaluations of technological modifications to traditional EFM-CTG monitoring and analysis were excluded. Data extraction and synthesis: We extracted influences on EFM-CTG from the included studies. Findings were synthesised using a best-fit framework approach, structured using an existing 19-domain framework of contributory factors for patient safety incidents in hospitals. Results: 142 articles and 14 reports were included. Our synthesis identified influences on EFM practice across all 19 domains of the contributory factors framework, including those relating to cognitive, social and organisational factors and interactions between professional work and tools used for fetal monitoring. Conclusion: Reducing avoidable harm associated with electronic fetal monitoring requires a systems approach based on a sound understanding of the full range of influences on practice

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Lamé, G., Liberati, E. G., Canham, A., Burt, J., Hinton, L., Draycott, T., Winter, C., Dakin, F. H., Richards, N., Miller, L., Willars, J., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2023). Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis. BMJ Quality & Safety, 33(4), 246–256.

MLA Style

Lamé, G, et al. “Why Is Safety in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring so Hard? A Qualitative Study Combining Human Factors/Ergonomics and Social Science Analysis.” BMJ Quality & Safety, vol. 33, no. 4, 2023, pp. 246–56.

Chicago Style

Lamé, G, EG Liberati, A Canham, et al. 2023. “Why Is Safety in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring so Hard? A Qualitative Study Combining Human Factors/Ergonomics and Social Science Analysis.” BMJ Quality & Safety 33 (4): 246–56.
Print